From the vcf specification:
"GT genotype, encoded as alleles values separated by either of ”/” or “|”, e.g. The allele values are 0 for the reference allele (what is in the reference sequence), 1 for the first allele listed in ALT, 2 for the second allele list in ALT and so on."
The ALT alleles are in this case separated by commas, such as in
20 1110696 rs6040355 A G,T 67 PASS NS=2;DP=10;AF=0.333,0.667;AA=T;DB GT:GQ:DP:HQ 1|2:21:6:23,27 2|1:2:0:18,2 2/2:35:4
In your case, you must have had a variant with 3 alleles listed in ALT.
source:
https://www.internationalgenome.org/wiki/Analysis/vcf4.0/
Hello Tania!
Questions similar to yours can already be found at:
We have closed your question to allow us to keep similar content in the same thread.
If you disagree with this please tell us why in a reply below. We'll be happy to talk about it.
Cheers!
None of the above is answering me. Why rush to close it? !!! Not asking about 0/0 0/1 etc. In your second link Devon is questioning So 2/0 is ACAC/A and 2/1 is ACAC/ACACAC. You only have two alternate alleles shown, so there should be no 3/? in there. This is basically a modified VCF format.
which is my question, I have 3?
Devon got the answer. A: Meaning Of Genotype 2/0 And 2/1
Please read the VCF spec.
In the ref? Not the alt? I am missing something I understand 1/3 but not 2/3 or 3/3 not the first time to read the spec.
so you have 4 alleles. REF is 0 and your column ALT should contain 3 alleles (1,2 and 3). So a genotype '1/3' is heterozygous diallelic with allele index 1 and allele index 3.
I am not asking about 1/3 i swear :) You answer what I am not asking about and rush to close the thread !!!
Hi Tania I think I understand your question. I think you assume that the reference is the first entry and this confuses you that you assume GT should be 0/1 or 1/1 or 1/2 or 1/3 etc like the first one is usually 0 or 1? Right? Because I was there too :) These are indeces so in Devon answer 0 is ref, 1 is first alt and 2 is second alt so on. So when you see 2/3 it means the second alt and the third alt. it doesn't mean its second ref and the third alt. Does this match your thoughts?
Thanks so much Sharon !
ok, I reopened the question (please do not delete it)
Tania : Please do not delete threads once they have received comments/answers.
Please don't close thread before understanding the question ! You are free to close and I am not free to delete !
This thread was not closed. You were being asked not to delete it since at least three people have offered comments/answers. Deleting a thread is ok if you made a mistake in the original question (and there were no comments/answers offered) but otherwise it is disrespectful to people who are trying to help you.
@genomax. I closed it at the beginning (as a 'duplicate')
You complained about the fact is was closed. I acknowledged you request and reopened the question.
Thanks Pierre Lindenbaum !