20% of unknown-source contamination RNA-Seq Illumina
3
0
Entering edit mode
6.9 years ago
crimsontabaq ▴ 70

We're working with a de novo transcriptome of a non-model organism. There were some genome assemblies for it, but we decided not to use it for GE analysis since they weren't annotated and also looked suspicious in some ways. Yet we've tried to map rRNA/mitRNA filtered reads on each of them and it appeared that 7-20% of reads wouldn't map on any variant of subject genome, so it's a contamination. We've mapped unaligned reads on genomes of every organism we're also working with, but there weren't any serious match (0-1%).

What could it be? Is it for sure contamination of some kind or might be something else?

Should we still work with all reads, or

choose those which are aligned on a genome and assemble a de novo transcripts with them?

UPD: The organism is basidiomycete fungus Lentinula edodes.

RNA-Seq contamination sequencing • 1.8k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
6.9 years ago
Michael 54k

You should give full details of your organism. I think it is too simple to think of a whole body sample as single organism. Likely it's a symbiosis or a parasite you are picking up. Use a meta transcriptomics approach using blast vs nt /Nr and Megan to find the source.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I've updated the OP. How do you blast READS? There are hundreds of millions of them with the length 30-45 bp. Did you mean blasting assembled contigs?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

You can use one of the faster alternatives to blast and only use it on the reads that are left over, but simply using the contigs should be good enough. In addition you can use kraken. Consider also that 80-93 %aligned is quite OK for a nomo depending on the completeNess of the genomes.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

If this rate of unaligned reads is fine, am i suppose to use all reads (aligned and unaligned) in further work?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
6.9 years ago

I'd also suggest BBSketch as an alternative to Blast. It's really fast, and can compare your reads to everything in nt or RefSeq:

sendsketch.sh in=reads.fq reads=1m nt

or

sendsketch.sh in=reads.fq reads=1m refseq
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
6.9 years ago
Joe 21k

Screen your reads with Kraken. If your organism is a microbe, it'll QC your data. If your organism isn't, then Kraken might at least be able to pick up some of the contaminants if they are microbial

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1227 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6