Annotation of transposons with the EDTA pipeline
Why did the comment ratio decrease after I added curatedlib?
edta
• 801 views
•
link
updated
by
biofalconch
132
• |
written
by
xiangjian
0
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Why am I getting such a big difference in alignment rates in kallisto?
written by bioinfo 19Hello, I have a project that I had aligned in the past using kallisto version 0.46 and an index made from ensembl version 98. The …
-
Failed kmer content
written by Kasturi 0I have an Illumina sequencing data . When I ran fastqc it did not show any column for kmer content. When I cleaned the data …
-
Dramatic decrease of mapping efficiency between Bwameth and Bismark
written by Raphael 1Hi all, I have mapped an rrbs sequencing with bwameth and bismark and obtained very differents results (see in the table below). I have observ …
-
expression density plot
written by sindhujarajavelu 0I did geo2r analysis for gse5850. The control curve and test curve overlapped in expression density plot after normalisation. Could anyone explain why does it …
-
mmquant run failure
written by Whirlingdaf 6I am attempting to run mmquant and it keeps being killed after reading in the .gtf files. The script I am running is pasted below …
-
Question about deduplication with UMI-tools
written by Chadi Saad 11Hello, I deduplicated a BAM file using umitools. Before i had : 98186207 after deduplication, I obtain : 58930293 so the ratio is before/after = …
-
microRNA-seq sequence lenght distribution after trimming
written by szabo.marton 1Hi! I'm doing a microRNA-seq analysis. After trimming and checking the results **in FastQC the sequence length distribution panel shows two peaks at 24 nt …
-
Minimum read length in Trimmomatic
written by matiqau 1Hello everyone, I am using Trimmomatic to trim RNA seq data.My question is why we set the minimum read length 36? if we decrease this …
-
Ts/Tv ratio of 1.7
written by jarod_v6 1I have one sample (Tumor and normal) . Starting from the same batch I made a pre-tretment and after Vardict call and snpeff annotation I …
-
R sampling command size not correct
written by John 7``` > ratio[i] [1] 0.9 > length(sample(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),2000*ratio[i],replace=T)) [1] 1800 > length(sample(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),2000*(1-ratio[i]),replace=T)) [1] 199 ``` Could someone help me figure out why the third command didn't …
What is a comment ratio? We need more context about the problem if you are looking for help :)