If OP had formatted their added info in a more readable way, you'd probably have seen that the Dbxref is not an attribute provided by the orf caller:
NODE_23_length_59792_cov_23.204747 Prodigal_v2.6.3 CDS 1 147 19.5 - 0 ID=1_1;partial=10;start_type=TTG;rbs_motif=None;rbs_spacer=None;gc_cont=0.299;conf=98.71;score=18.89;cscore=30.86;sscore=-11.98;rscore=-0.99;uscore=-0.73;tscore=-9.61;
NODE_23_length_59792_cov_23.204747 Prodigal_v2.6.3 CDS 523 1983 198.6 - 0 ID=1_2;partial=00;start_type=ATG;rbs_motif=None;rbs_spacer=None;gc_cont=0.300;conf=99.99;score=198.00;cscore=196.39;sscore=1.61;rscore=-0.99;uscore=0.35;tscore=2.90;
context is missing.
for instance, I annotated my MAGs using Prokka and Prodigal respectively. The gff file that I obtain afterwards lack the attribute "Name" eg. prodigal:
prokka:
I need to get a gff file with the following attribute including "Name" eg.
(...)
sigh... This comment is not an answer, you'd better add it to your original post. And add some formatting, for example enclose the gff sections with code blocks (the 101010 icon), have each line on their own line, etc.
Getting the 'name' attribute is a data analysts job. Prodigal will give you the gene predictions, you'll need to match those with functional annotations.