This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
DESeq2 lfcshrink, normal vs. apeglm

Hello!

I want to kindly ask a question regarding the lfcshrink function of DESeq2.

We realized that the log2fold changes in our data are abnormally large (above 20), so we decided to use the lfcShrink() function. However, I have been doing some reading and I realize there are two main types of lfcShrink to deflate large log2fold values, type="apeglm" and type="normal". Does it make a systematic difference on which type we use? I have attempted both types on our data, and the results seem similar, although apeglm had a larger range of log2fold absolute changes (0 to 4) while normal was between 0-1 absolute log2fold changes. Which one do you recommend using?

Thank you so much in advance!

deseq2 apeglm deseq2
• 4,509 views • link
updated by Kevin Blighe Kevin Blighe • written by OST • OST

1 answer

You should probably ask this on the Bioconductor Support Forum: https://support.bioconductor.org/

However, there, you will probably be directed to the extensive vignette (it's really really good): Alternative shrinkage estimators

Kevin

• 0 views • link
written by Kevin Blighe Kevin Blighe

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this