Some documentation I found suggests that a GenBank GI number will change each time the sequence changes - even if only one base is affected. The Accession number, on the other hand, remains the same.
However, the accession number is usually qualified with a version number suffix, e.g. "GL000191.1". As far as I know, this version number also increments each time the sequence changes.
Does this mean that the relationship between GI number and the Accession.Version pair is one-to-one, and so either would be equally suitable as a unique identifier for a sequence?
Thanks.
•
written
by
Bio_X2Y
2 answers
Yes, you're right: see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Sitemap/sequenceIDs.html
The two systems of identifiers run in parallel to each other. That is, when any change is made to a sequence, it receives a new GI number AND an increase to its version number.
Your observation is true. They run in parallel, but GI system is older. So, there's a lot of sequences tagged with version 1 but with many GIs in its history. For example, check the history of L42023 and its subsequences at the NCBI Sequence Revision History. You'll see a many GI changes without a version number associated with it.
Besides that, GI and versions change only when the sequence itself changes, not the annotations. Changes in annotations can be traced only by modification date. So, GIs and versions are mostly useless.
Log in to answer this question.
-
GI numbers in NCBI
written by Christoph •
-
Are Genbank's accession numbers unique identifiers?
written by Nico •
-
Do fasta files at ftp.ncbi ever change once uploaded?
written by andrewsanchez •
-
run fadiff to compare fasta files
written by arfaj a •
-
convert gisaid Accession number to genbank id
written by janghj12000 •
-
How To Retrieve A Gff With Sequence Identifier Different Than Gb With Bioperl
written by fbrundu
-
Strategizing Blast Result Parsing
written by Zach Powers
-
Retrieve Chromosome Number And Position From Gene Id In Danio Rerio
written by Eric Normandeau
-
Question About Transfac Database Data Quality
written by Zhe Liu •
-
Visualization Of Custom Agilent In Situ Oligonucleotide Array
written by User 5463 •
Yes, that's right. Accession.Version is probably preferred by humans, and GI number by machines.
Sorry, I can't resist :-P http://lmgtfy.com/?q=NCBI+gi
@Pierre, hmmmm, while I can see the funny side, I had read that page, but I still wasn't 100% clear if the relationship was always one-to-one... :) e.g. I once thought that the version number would increment if the sequence changed OR the meta-information of the sequence changed, e.g. the gene symbol. I now know that isn't the case now, but I thought maybe GI would increment on a meta change....