Discrepancy in structural variants results from mauve and MUM&Co
Hi, I am calling structural variants from de novo assembled bacterial genome. I used mauve and MUM&Co. I got very different results from these two tools. Many structural variants like inversion detected by mauve dismissing in the output results from MUM&Co. Any idea why the tools are giving different results? Thanks
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
MUMmer for structural variant call
written by rthapa •
-
Assembly based structural variants detection
written by rthapa •
-
Structural variants call from circular genome
written by rthapa •
-
Assembly based structural variants call from bacterial genome
written by rthapa •
-
bacterial genome assembly output from canu
written by rthapa •
-
de novo genome assembly of bacterial genome
written by rthapa •
-
bacterial genome assembly with canu and alignment with reference genome with mauve
written by rthapa •
-
structural variants from mauve
written by rthapa •
-
structural variants in de novo genome assemblies
written by Anand Rao
-
Detecting structural variants when comparing assembled genome and reference
written by godeludanu •
