All right! Thank you Kevin!
Dear friends,
I am running the WGCNA tutorial code. In tutorial I, section2.c, my results are different from the tutorial(https://horvath.genetics.ucla.edu/html/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/WGCNA/Tutorials/FemaleLiver-03-relateModsToExt.pdf).
In detail, in the 2.c.2 of the 'FemaleLiver-03-relateModsToExt.pdf',
>table(bwLabels) #The whole code is in the tutorial I of WGCNA(https://horvath.genetics.ucla.edu/html/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/WGCNA/Tutorials/), you would spend 10 mins to perform the step1, step2.a, step2.b, and this line is in step2.c.
My result is
bwLabels
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21
147 568 462 531 225 275 125 207 51 120 100 100 146 83 77 76 44 42 34 98
22
89
The tutorial is
bwLabels
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
142 472 470 479 271 327 130 209 153 121 100 100 104 77 73 81 40 42 34 91
20
84
So they are different, I wonder why the same code and same data would produce the different results. The data are in the same site of the tutorial, you can easily get them and spend a few minutes to run the tutorial. Could anyone please test the tutorial and give me some advice? Thank you very much!
Aifu.
1 answer
My result:
table(bwLabels)
bwLabels
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21
147 568 462 531 225 275 125 207 51 120 100 100 146 83 77 76 44 42 34 98
22
89
I put it down to one or more of the following:
- an old tutorial whose content has not been updated for a long time (2014)
- a modern R environment where the base functions have been modified since WGCNA was initially developed
- the WGCNA functions themselves have been modified but the tutorial never updated.
Kevin
Hi Kevin, you're right. I use R3.1.2, and WGCNA1.41.1, the result is the same with the tutorial.
Log in to answer this question.
