Confused on PacBio outputs
Hi,
I am trying to figure out which PacBio output to use for SPAdes hybrid assembly. I was given the three .bax.h5 files, the one .bas.h5 file, and the three fastq/fastq files. I have read that currently, the reads are stored in the three .bax.h5 files. So I was going to concat these files and convert the file to fastq. However, now I am second guessing doing that since there is already .fastq files given. Is there a reason why people do not use the already provided .fastq?
Thanks in advance, Morgan
• 1,875 views
•
link
written
by
Morgan S. •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
NCBI reported coverage from long and short reads
written by Morgan S. •
-
Hybrid assembly to produce full genome
written by JJ13 •
-
Which PacBio outputs to use for de novo assembly?
written by tbeignier •
-
To reassemble Illumina and PacBio, or just upgrade previous assembly with PacBio?
written by Morgan S. •
-
MAKER annotation pipeline output
written by Morgan S. •
-
PacBio Quality checking tool
written by vahapel
-
what version of smrtanalysis should be used for older PacBio file format (bas.h5)?
written by mjp •
-
HGAP using old and new type of PacBio data
written by mjp •
-
What are the ".bax.h5" files generated by PacBio long reads sequencing ?
written by Rox
-
Help understanding the bam file generated from BLASR alignment
written by JstRoRR
Use the fastq files that are provided.
It says that the fastq files are the pre-filtered subreads and that's okay to use?
As long as they were pre-filtered to remove the PacBio adapters, which you don't want in your assembly.