Is it safe to assume that a sequence assigned to a particular COG ID in an old version of eggNOG is related to sequences assigned to that same COG ID in the latest version?
In more detail, I would like to fund the ‘COG functional category’ for some eggNOG COG IDs retrieved from UniProtKB (e.g. www.uniprot.org/uniprot/F0YY04.txt) However, I don’t know the version of eggNOG that these COG IDs were created under. I am wondering if I can safely use the COG-functional mapping provided in the latest version of eggNOG (v4.5) to infer the function of my UniProt sequences.
I am aware that I could query the UniProt sequences against the latest version of eggNOG, but this would be much more time consuming than using the available mappings supplied by UniProtKB.
Many thanks
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
-
Biomart doesn't output ALL uniprot IDs
written by sgupt46 •
-
Mapping of OMA IDs to UniProtKB AC
written by george •
-
How to avoid missannotated GO terms?
written by Arslan Tariq •
-
Functional categories assignment
written by wes •
-
Conversion of Ensembl Gene Ids to Uniprot Ids
written by deddu •
-
News: UniProt: Changes to Proteomes
written by Elisabeth Gasteiger
-
Fishers test for cog analysis
written by manjumoorthy95 •
-
Can a protein sequence be assigned to multiple orthologous groups in eggNOG?
written by jjoh090 •
-
Tutorial: How to get protein sequence from UniProtID or any other accession
written by Whoknows
-
Forum: Reminder: UniprotKB Accession Number Format To Be Extended To 10 Characters
written by Elisabeth Gasteiger
see this: A: What are those "ENOG" numbers in eggNOG 4.5?