Is merging the str1 and str2 bigwig files with RPM correct?
Is it correct to merge bigwig with TPM values from rnaSeq from different biological replicates for the same condition ?
STAR can give output in bigwig for each strand with RPM values for each biological replicate.
Is it correct to merge them to visualize them in one track ? or does it corrupt initialy computed TPM values ?
is it better to look separately to each replicate or should I just merge raw counts ?
I'd like to have only one track for each condition in the viewer (IGV, or UCSC...) and not several tracks per condition.
• 2,782 views
•
link
1 answer
I would keep biological replicates separate and use them to test my hypothesis. You can use any one of three replicates to generate a figure. If the event you want to display on one track, is statistically accurate, it should be present in individual replicates too.
• 0 views
•
link
• 0 views
•
link
Log in to answer this question.