This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Database For Transcription Factor Binding Sites Annotation (Tfbs)

hi,

I have looked into Yale TFBS in UCSC, but it seems that the TFBS in UCSC are not quite enough for me to overlap my snp positions.

Is there any database for transcription factor binding sites annotation (TFBS). Both the experimental data predict one are OK.

Thanks for these help! Annother question is that the UCSC Yale TFBS track has many results for different cells with same transfactors, while results of each cell do not contain all TFs in this track. So if i want to verify whether my snp is overlaped in this TFBS, can i combine all the results from different cells? If not, how can i handle this case, which make me much confused these days!

transcription binding database snp

3 answers

ORegAnno has some you might be interested in. http://www.oreganno.org/ There's also an ORegAnno track at UCSC.

There's also the TFBS Conserved track at UCSC. It's predictions, and had some constraints about the ones that are reported (based on species conservation), but you might find some utility there too.

Thanks for your suggestion. The ORegAnno is a great databse. It indeed has some important information. But it seems that the result of this database has a large differences with UCSC, in which only 3-4 tf binding sites are displayed. So my question is that can i combine the results of these databases? It seems not. So which database is better for SNP TFBS overlap?

Hi,

here are the number of TBFs that have matrix models associated with it.

hope this helps.

Thank you for your suggestions. But we do not buy the TRANSFAC database while the public version only offers few data for TFBS. And it seems that both the other three sources do not give the annotation of the TFBS (start and end).

please read Neilfws comment.

Yes, there are lots of such databases. I hate to answer with the words "try a Google search" but in this case...try a Google search for "transcription factor binding sites database". One of the most useful is the top hit: JASPAR.

The JASPAR is a very useful database. But it seems that the database offer us a matrix data for the transcription without giving the start and end annotations of the TFBS of the protein!

Thanks for comment. It looks like that the mapper database is something like MATCH (using transfac matrix) software. Then is there any different between the two methods?

Log in to answer this question.