Has anyone dealt with Nextera transposase sequence contamination before? Wondering if this is something we should work to eliminate. What would be an acceptable level of contamination?
Thank you

2 answers
I just had a sample where 90% of the output was this crap... Even so, after removing it, the data was similar to another technical replicate that did not have the transposase, so I think your levels are usable.
What I used is SeqPrep, so:
SeqPrep -A GTGTATAAGAGACAG -B CTGTCTCTTATACAC -f in_r1.fastq -r in_r2.fastq -1 out_noTP_r1.fastq.gz -2 out_noTP_r2.fastq.gz
The part I have in -B is the same sequence you have indicated, just longer by 3 bp. The part I have in -A is just the reverse complement of -B. This was 2 years ago so I do not remember 100% where I found it, but I remember validating it visually on misalignments.
The link is unavailable. Do you have another?
here is the link Illumina Adapter Sequences
Log in to answer this question.
Hi all,
I've just found in Nextera™ DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina®-Compatible)
Looks like It is not true that this sequence is NOT sequence if we have it in our reads... according to this paper it shouldn't?
Does this could be cased by library contamination?
Best,
Agata
It's not sequenced if your inserts aren't shorter than the read length. Essentially, you only sequence it if you read through the insert in the other adapter. Which matches the observations here: the adapter is reached at the ends of the reads.
What the text you copied means it that it isn't sequenced at the beginning of the read.