Looking at the nf-core/rnaseq pipeline, the alignment and quantification tools that are available are STAR+Salmon, STAR+RSEM and HISAT2. I've not had to deal with bulk RNASeq data for a while so I'm wondering what is the consensus for getting raw counts out for DESeq2. In the past I ran STAR+htseq-count but that doesn't seem to be an option avialable from the pipeline which makes me wonder if it's because it's old and not the best way to do things any more.
•
written
by
yura.grabovska •
1 answer
htseq-count was effectively replaced by featureCounts and more recently that's largely (but not entirely!) been replaced by using salmon. So STAR+salmon or even just salmon alone would generally be best, assuming you have a well annotated transcriptome.
Log in to answer this question.
-
Multi/Cross Species rnaseq analysis
written by Tom Brady •
-
NF core rna-seq pipeline
written by rajdeepboral00 •
-
RNA-Seq expression analysis
written by Ric
-
Downstream analysis from STAR Alignment at transcript level
written by bassanio •
-
DEseq2 input
written by r.shiasi3897 •
-
DEseq2 input from nf-core/rnaseq
written by وفاء •
-
Exon counts do not match gene and transcript counts
written by firestar
-
When running salmon or star_salmon , are samples “independent” from one another during quantificati…
written by Pratik
-
Identifying and quantifying transcript variants in RNA-seq data
written by MieszkoL •
-
Detecting Novel Spliceforms from RNAseq data- Will STAR>RSEM work or do I need to use something els…
written by Jen •
