Thanks Jeremy, I am clearer on this now. One more question, does this mean all the sites where the reads from my sequenced genome mapped to the reference but the alleles they contained were the same as the ref are outputted to the gVCF as NON_REF?
Hi, I have a gvcf file produced from GATK. A lot of the sites in the vcf file have "NON_REF" in the alt allele column. It is a multi-sample joint genotyped vcf, so I can see that at some of the sites with NON_REF for alt allele, some of them samples have a 0/0 called genotype. I wanted to know what do this NON_REF or non variant sites actually refer to, are these sites which are homozygous for the ref allele? And if so then why are they in a vcf file?
Cheers
2 answers
The NON_REF is a placeholder term in gVCFs that means there is coverage in that region. If <NON_REF> is alone the block is reference with some possibility of variation.
#CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT NA12878
20 10001567 . A <NON_REF> . . END=10001616 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:38:99:34:0,101,1114
20 10001617 . C A,<NON_REF> 493.77 . BaseQRankSum=1.632;ClippingRankSum=0.000;DP=38;ExcessHet=3.0103;MLEAC=1,0;MLEAF=0.500,0.00;MQRankSum=0.000;RAW_MQ=136800.00;ReadPosRankSum=0.170 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL:SB 0/1:19,19,0:38:99:522,0,480,578,538,1116:11,8,13,6
20 10001618 . T <NON_REF> . . END=10001627 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:39:99:37:0,105,1575
20 10001628 . G A,<NON_REF> 1223.77 . DP=37;ExcessHet=3.0103;MLEAC=2,0;MLEAF=1.00,0.00;RAW_MQ=133200.00 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL:SB 1/1:0,37,0:37:99:1252,111,0,1252,111,1252:0,0,21,16
20 10001629 . G <NON_REF> . . END=10001660 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:43:99:38:0,102,1219
yes the <NON_REF> by itself means a span of homozygous ref
you're looking at a GVCF file, not a "VCF" file.
https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035531812-GVCF-Genomic-Variant-Call-Format
True variants must be called with gatk GenotypeGVCF
Hi Pierre, thank you for the input. Yes you are right, I am looking at a GVCF. But I just wanted to know what is the exact definition of a non-variant site. The GATK documentation page only has a one line mention where it says non variant sites represent the possibility of there being an alt allele at that position.
Log in to answer this question.