More posts like this
-
HADDOCK 2.4
written by Preeti •
-
HDOCK output files
written by Muhammad •
-
How can I get the exact 3D structure of the protein to use the PDB file for PPI docking
written by ADEYEMI •
-
About peptide design
written by fatema19.bge •
-
Protein-protein docking analysis
written by mahafujulislamtonmoy •
-
What does RMS in HEX represent?
written by sumayya_tariq •
-
Retrieve SIFT results using python and web server
written by nilus1432 •
-
Micro RNA docking
written by pradeep.pant25 •
-
NCBI blast PHP API choice
written by arronar
-
How to do analysis of ZDOCK server O/P of Protein-Protein docking scores.
written by rajkishore.ouatbi •
You've added even less information than your previous unanswered post. Have you looked through the extensive tutorials and best practises?
You don't provide any information about what you are trying to achieve or what kind of data you have available (i.e., NMR or crystal template, size of proteins, etc...).
i have three different runs with haddock score of -75, -68, -61 . Which one is better among these( molecule 1 is same in all three ,only molecule 2 is changed which is a single protein that is broken into three parts and then used)
You are only focusing on a single value. There are numerous descriptive statistics reported after a run. Together they describe the fit and confidence among others. Again, without knowing what your goal is and what you've done, nobody can answer your question. A description of the reported metrics can be found in their release papers and on their online documentation. My suggestion is to try and understand the reported metrics rather than focusing on just a score.
Can you please guide me what are the others descriptive statistics that can be taken into account for having a good confidence
https://www.bonvinlab.org/software/haddock2.2/scoring/