This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
What's best practice when determining a degenerate base when creating a primer?

I'm trying to design some primers myself because all of the primer packages I've found are either web-based, are not very user friendly, cannot handle large numbers of sequence targets, can't take in multiple sequence alignments, cannot create just a forward primer, and/or are not easy to install.

I'm at the last stage but now I need to decide a threshold for when to use IUPAC degenerate bases. Here is an example of a few positions that are not definitely A, C, G, or T.

For position 2697 I'll keep T but maybe for 2689 it should be C or T.

What is best practice when using a degenerate base? Should it be like setting a threshold (e.g., 70%) and if a base isn't present in at least 70% then see if the cumulative frequency for one of the degenerates is higher then choose the degenerate?

enter image description here

Degenerate bases: https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/iupac.html

primer-design alignment genomics

Your primers should have 100% homology to their target sequence. You should either order multiple primers with each alternative base or target a region that shows 100% homology between your samples.

Ok that’s good to know. I’m trying to design a primer set that can amplify fungal rRNA from 18S to 28S. Main use will be in silico

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.