what is that ? is it a comment ? is it a question ?
• 0 views
•
link
Hi all,
I am going through a work-flow for analysis of paired-end reads data obtained from next-seq 500 (based on a published protocol) and it is noted that the sequencing primer should be trimmed from the reads. I wonder why should you do that, since as far as I understand the sequencing primer shouldn't even be a part of the read, or am I wrong?
I would really appreciate your feedback!
Thanks
Log in to answer this question.
Sequencing primer should not be part of the reads. Perhaps the workflow meant to say adapters instead.
Thanks! I thought so too, wonder though if it could happened by chance or due to error in base calling