Identical peak coverage in IP bam file and Input bam file
Hi,
I had ChIP seq data that I aligned using STAR and got the bam files for and ran peak calling using macs2. I see a list of regions that are enriched, however, when I use the bam file for my IP and bam file for my Input to visualize in the genome browser, those regions do not show any difference in enrichment. Is there a possible reason for this or am I doing something wrong? Any help is appreciated.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Can DiffBind Perform Peak Calling and Differential Analysis Directly from BAM Files?
written by Siqi •
-
Normalizing Peaks in ChIP seq
written by mropri
-
Running linux command macs2 in R error
written by sidrah.maryam •
-
csaw filterWindows unused argument error
written by jennifer.d •
-
Normalizing ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq data?
written by star
-
Identify genes with chip signal > input prior to peak calling
written by SciDuck •
-
Performing differential binding analyses between ChIP samples using Deeptools (SES method normaliza…
written by a.rex
-
From bed file to enrichment score
written by GK1610
-
MACS2 bdgcmp for two bedgraph peak calling
written by BIOTIN •
-
Chip-Seq Visualization Without Using Any Peak Caller
written by kanwarjag
