Cluster Profiler- enrichGO
Hi all,
Can my input list of genes for enrichGO analysis be a list with both- up and downregulated genes?
Thank you!
clusterprofiler
• 3,281 views
•
link
updated
by
miccoli.andrea89 •
•
written
by
barix •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
How to deal with the clusterProfiler analysis result?
written by Tundup •I have done enrichGO, enrichKEGG, gseGO, gseKEGG, reactomePA for my DESeq results. ``` # Run enrichGO go_up <- enrichGO( gene = upregulated_merged$ENTREZID, OrgDb = org.Mm.eg.db, …
-
Visualizing Upregulated and Downregulated Genes in GO and KEGG Pathway Analyses
written by roxana •Hi Biostar community, I am conducting GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses on RNA-Seq data. My goal is to visualize both upregulated and downregulated genes …
-
How to apply enrichGO over a list
written by barix •Hi all! I have a list of 16 elements each containing DEx genes between our control and experimental groups ![list of DEGs][1] [1]: /media/images/700fd22e-62dd-4808-a0bc-6fdc6bd2 I …
-
Gene list for GO enrichment after DESeq2. Should I use a gene list of differentially expressed gene…
written by Lautaro •Hi, I have been starting by first steps into RNA-Seq data and I have been performing my first analysis since two months ago. So I …
-
Input of 173 genes into enrichGO but no pathways are shown
written by foxiw •Hi, I'm trying to use the clusterProfiler package to explore which pathways are overrepresented in my list of significantly differentiated genes. I have 173 DE …
-
DAVID enrichment analysis
written by barix •Hi! I have single-cell rna seq data and would like to do gene enrichment analysis using DAVID (experimental group vs. control). 1. Should I give …
-
Enrichment of a specific GO term
written by barix •Hi all, I'm using clusterProfiler for gene enrichment analysis and would like to check how enriched are specific GO terms. For example, I have df …
-
Making plots for enrichment and KEGG results
written by ymervenuryavuz •Hello everyone, With the clusterProfiler package implemented in R, I made gene ontology analysis with enrichGO function and KEGG analysis with enrichKEGG function. Gene ontology …
-
genlist for clusterprofiler
written by Omics data miningDear all, I am using the clusterprofiler. I used the enrichGO, enrichKEGG and enrichDO . data<-read.delim("enrich.txt") genes<-data$entrez[abs(data$expr)>2] I used genes as input in enrichGO,enirchKEGG. But …
-
Forum: "Separate enrichment analysis of pathways for up- and downregulated genes"
written by WoaI recently came across this paper. I wish to know if anybody already following this method or not. **Separate enrichment analysis of pathways for up- …
I think this depends on your biological question. Is it relevant for you to find enriched pathways in genes "altered" regardless of the direction of change in your experiment? If it is, go for it. You can try both approaches and compare results. (You'll probably get more results by merging the up- and down-genes because of having more power, and maybe that's why you're asking. But the decision should ideally be because of biological reasons).
Thank you for the help! I wasn't sure would it be correct to give as an input merged up and down- list of genes, because of the way of how enrichGO function calculates scores. I know this is basic question, but I'm total beginner in this field. Thanks a lot!
AFAIK enrichGO basically does enrichment tests of the type of the hypergeometric test, so the only relevant parameters to test if your genes are enriched for any pathway are numbers: the number of genes you have and those which belong to the pathway, the size of your total universe of measured genes, the number of genes in the pathway.
There are other gene set analyses that do indeed take into account directionality, such as GSEA. For these, generally one inputs the genes accompanied by some measure of amount+direction of change, such as combinations of logFC and test statistics. This review is a bit outdated but can serve you to understand typical variations of gene set enrichment analyses. enrichGO would go under the "ORA" category (over-representation analysis).
Hello all. I will build on barix's question. I would like to know which is the correct universe of genes to use in case of: 1) enrichment of genes altered regardless of the direction of change: is all genes used as input for statistical testing by the DESeq2 pipeline? 2) enrichment of genes altered in a particular direction: is all genes used as input for statistical testing by the DESeq2 pipeline or only those for which statistical significance was found?
Thank you
Personally I would use as universe, for both cases, all genes used as input for statistical testing.
Thank you.
A