From what I understood is that this project is just to show our knowledge of data analysis in R. He wasn't very clear, we both were in a rush today, he just we implied that he did not like it because the connection of GSEA results to patient cancer data would be weak. Which i agree its a leap, but perhaps not too farfetched, unless there is something very obvious that I am missing.
Oh i agree that it might be overkill, but everything that I have explained mirrors was we did in class or what I have worked on for my master project, so most of the coding is done. The conversion to human gene ID is to show technical ability in R, and to pretend that the originally study was done in humans, so I could interrogate patient gene expression as well.
Yes I agree, the GSEA would be the exploratory data used to formulate my hypothesis. As much as I would like to go through the literature, this assignment doesnt really warrant that amount of effort! I assumed what i purposed would suffice in showing my skills while still having an interesting presentation. I am just curious if there is something blatantly obvious wrong in my thought process, that I am missing.
Thank you for the response!