Precision of variant calling (INDELs)
The same sample (NA12878) was sequenced as WES and WGS, and analysed by the same pipeline (in case of WES it was restricted to the bed size). The precision for WES was lower by 2 % than for WGS and I have no explanation for that. Could library preparation influence that?
Thanks
• 1,163 views
•
link
updated
by
desouzareis.r
•
written
by
esimonova.me •
•
written
by
esimonova.me •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
validation of pipeline for SV, SNV and repeat analysis
written by ashkan
-
Freebayes - too many variants produced on WES sample
written by esimonova.me •
-
Validation of Bioinformatics pipeline with NA12763
written by esimonova.me •
-
GATK VQSR filter
written by esimonova.me •
-
How many INDELs and SNPs should I expect in vcf file and what the best parameters to filter false p…
written by esimonova.me •
-
VCF evaluation using RTG.jar vcfeval
written by Sara
-
454 GS FLX WGS data analysis
written by dpc
-
ChIPseq - Identical peaks in IP and input samples
written by dorota.komar •
-
BBmerge histogram of insert size
written by Sharon
-
Questions about LB field in SAM specification for PCR duplicate removal
written by James Ashmore
Hi, yes it could. You can compare coverage between them, especially in regions where there are false positive and false negative variants resulted from the comparison. VCFEval for example generates the files fp.vcf and fn.vcf that you can look at.