multiqc report, should I care for "Per Base Sequence Content" module if using metagenomic datasets?
Hello I ran fastqc and later multiqc for parsing my metagenomic files, and on the Per Base Sequence Content module all my files are marked with red (i.e they failed the analysis) should I really take care of this given the fact that I'm using metagenomic datasets?.
• 1,713 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
v.berriosfarias •
•
written
by
v.berriosfarias •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
why my fastqc on trimmed data failed?
written by kamran.kouchakzadeh.kk •
-
fastqc: Per base sequence content
written by khoojj •
-
Fastqc report for small RNA sequencing
written by Aiswarya •
-
Per base sequence content failed in fastQC
written by yliueagle
-
Per sequence GC content still not good after trimming
written by zouini6 •
-
whole genome sequencing data analysis
written by ipb727258 •
-
how to remove warning and failures observed inQuality report by Fastqc for RNA-Seq data
written by aiswaryabioinfo •
-
NGS Fastqc explanation
written by GHanumanth404 •
-
Do I have to check every fastqc to make good quality?
written by khaeuk
-
Quality report by Fastqc, Result Interpretation and Next step parameters
written by ravi.uhdnis
Show us what the plot looks like.
In many cases, the answer to this is "no". See positional sequence bias in randomly primed libraries, though of course this depends on your library prep and may not apply in this case.