over represented adapter in reverse but not in forward reads?
Hello
I am processing some raw RNAseq reads from illumina. FastQC accused that some reverse files had over representation of adapters. I plan to use trimmomatic to trim those specific sequences as paired-end reads. I assume I should also remove the palindrome in the forward files, but FastQC did not accuse any of the forward files to have any kind of over representation. Is this normal?
• 820 views
•
link
written
by
demoraesdiogo2017 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Trimming of reverse complement primers
written by aupris •
-
No trimming of reverse reads using Trimmomatic-0.39
written by hgal4248 •
-
Agilent SureSelect V5 adapters for WES
written by Rick P •
-
Trimmomatic reverse reads not improve
written by saleh.sereshki •
-
Understanding trimmomatic adapter files and trimming
written by Ml6237 •
-
Removing overrepresented primer sequences
written by Ml6237 •
-
Interpretation of Trimmomatic Results after Paired-End Adapter Trimming
written by sevenless •
-
Trimmomatic output: how to include unpaired reads in the assembly?
written by dark.lord •
-
Exome Seq Alignment - What to do with unpaired reads post trimming
written by andrew.j.skelton73
-
Trimmomatic not removing TruSeq3 adapters
written by benjaminmorgan2016 •
