Thanks! I did wonder if it was a mistake
• 0 views
•
link
I am having a bit of a hard time understanding why the insertion example in #3 in 5.1.1 (link below) has a TC for REF. Why would it not just be C or the base before the event and then ALT just be CA? What am I missing here? Thank you!
I don't think you're missing anything; the REF=TC choice only makes sense if the deletion and insertion are being reported in the same variant (REF=TC, ALT=T,TCA), and the specification makes no mention of that.
Feel free to create an issue at https://github.com/samtools/hts-specs/issues .
Thanks! I did wonder if it was a mistake
Log in to answer this question.
This looks like a multi-allelic entry (like chrchang says) that was split but not subjected to left alignment + parsimony.