This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Are liger or Seurat CCA good strategies for multiple scRNA-seq data integration?

Hi,

I am working on analyzing multiple scRNA-seq dataset from embryonic tissues at progressive stages. I used three recent integration algorithms 1) liger, 2) Seurat CCA and 3) fastMNN. I started with these based on recommendation from peers and availability of Seurat Wrapper for these approaches.

In my experience, I observe that both liger and Seurat CCA are over integrating dataset. For example, I expect to see a some overlapping population and some unique when I comapre a tissue sample at two different points; both of these approaches suggest that two populations are very identical.

Just merging the two data sort of gives the expected results. fastMNN approach also give similar result. I feel that some adjustments need to be made for integrating two data at different points, however current integrating approaches (liger and seurat CCA) overcorrect the problem. And I don't know what is a good approach.

I just want know what other people who are dealing with integrating multiple scRNA-seq think about it?

Thanks!

scrna-seq dataset integration

it's a pain of our generation, really. Everyone gets by as a function of the desired result, sometimes even forgoing the integration/batch-correction altogether and using the normalized logcounts directly if the samples were more or less prepped and sequenced together

1 answer

found a paper may be useful: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/699959v2

thanks! will look into it.

Log in to answer this question.