gene co-expression network
Hi everyone,
Is it logical to analysis the gene co-expression network between samples with 3 repeats?
In order to construct a biosynthesis gene co-expression network which one is more valid? Meta-Analysis result or individual study result.
I would be very pleased if you could guide me.
• 1,364 views
•
link
written
by
Morteza Hadizadeh •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Cross-platform of microarray or analysis separately
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
Create a heatmap
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
Remove NaNs from ExpressionSet class object
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
convert GB ID or SPOT ID to gene symbol in plant platforms
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and expression matrix
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
Remove from a list or replace NaN with a value
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
extracting the gene list associated with the samples in pheatmap.
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
remove NAs values from gset
written by Morteza Hadizadeh •
-
Micro array gene expression data correlation
written by Santosh •
-
RNA-seq analysis: How to generate a master gene expression matrix to do co-expression cross all con…
written by sclittlerain •
How many total samples do you have? - 3 replicates per group is fine, but how many total groups and samples do you have?
It seems that you have samples from multiple studies - it is correct? You should process these separately (construct a co-expression network for each study), and then do meta-analysis.
Apologies for the delay in replying. There are two groups in this study, control (3replicates) and treated samples (3rep). there is just one group of treated samples.
Your follow-up question is here: gene expression correlation analysis