Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
FastQC Poor Quality in first base only
0
Entering edit mode
18 months ago

I had sequenced a total of 39 microbium samples. Of these 37 are pure cultures, grown in the lab, and the remaining two were randomly obtained from soil.

These samples were sequenced (paired-end sequencing of the 16s metagenome). In case of the pure samples, they all passed the quality checks in FastQC.

However in case of the 2 samples obtained from soil, only the first base of read 1, turned out to be of poor quality. As a result of which, the samples failed the quality check.

Is there any particular reason as to why the first base turned out to be so poor compared to the rest? Does it have any biological significance or is it a library preparation error entirely?

ADD COMMENTlink
0
Entering edit mode

See for example SeqAnswers.

ADD REPLYlink
0
Entering edit mode

can you post some bit sand pieces from your fastqc report for those samples so that we can have a more detailed look?

ADD REPLYlink

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.3.1