how about that!
sum(width(unlist(fiveUTRsByTranscript(txdb))))
[1] 21299710
sum(width(unlist(threeUTRsByTranscript(txdb))))
[1] 86927764
• 0 views
•
link
Is this because of non-coding RNA? I thought these would have been at least comparable.
library(GenomicFeatures)
txdb <- makeTxDbFromEnsembl("Homo Sapiens",server="useastdb.ensembl.org")
gr<-cds(txdb)
sum(width(reduce(gr)))
[1] 41901692
gr<-exons(txdb)
sum(width(reduce(gr)))
[1] 153094341
3' and 5' UTR as well as non-coding species.
how about that!
sum(width(unlist(fiveUTRsByTranscript(txdb))))
[1] 21299710
sum(width(unlist(threeUTRsByTranscript(txdb))))
[1] 86927764
4-5x is right in the neighborhood of their average between 5' and 3'. :)
Table 1 in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC139023/
Yeah, the mean 3' UTR is around 40% of the length of a transcript and a not insubstantial number of UTRs are more than 75% of the transcript.
Log in to answer this question.
yes, there are a bunch of non-coding RNA families (rRNA, tRNA, miRNA, snRNA, lncRNA, ...) which can be in your exon list but not in your CDS