This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
ATAC-seq on mouse brain tissues

Hi,

Since couple of months, I am working on ATAC-seq optimization starting from mouse brain tissues using Buenrostro et al Protocol (Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 2015). At the end of library preparation, and just prior to sequencing, I am trying to validate the established library using qPCR by checking the enrichment of accessible and inaccessible regions known to be found in the mouse brain tissues (For this aim I designed a set of positive and negative primers based on publicly available ATAC-seq data from the ENCODE project). The issue I am facing is that both negative and positive primers are giving exactly the same enrichment level. I checked every single step in the protocol and so far it is going in line with Buenrostro's protocol. Actually, I am doubting the integrity of nuclei being isolated from the brain tissues (noting that for nuclei isolation I am using a commercial kit from invent biotechnologies). I am checking the quality of nuclei using Trypan blue counting method and morphologically wise, they look good. But actually, I am not sure about the chromosomal integrity of those nuclei and whether the former is affected by the procedure of isolation.

I would greatly appreciate if someone can share his/her experience in this issue or suggest something in this concern.

Thank you in advance,

atac-seq sequencing next-gen nuclei_isolation

Typically, one does not need to verify the library with qPCR. Given that the nucleosomal ladder is well visible on a gel or Bioanalyzer/Tapestation, you should submit it for sequencing. Can you show the Bioanalyzer or gel picture of the library?

Still, not a bioinformatics question. You can post on a different forum if you want and share the link so that I can follow up.

Hello si44!

We believe that this post does not fit the main topic of this site.

This question is more appropriate for SeqAnswers.com or biology stackexchange.

For this reason we have closed your question. This allows us to keep the site focused on the topics that the community can help with.

If you disagree please tell us why in a reply below, we'll be happy to talk about it.

Cheers!

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.