Trimmomatic adapter clipping removes many reads even if "keepBothReads" parameter is selected
1
0
Entering edit mode
5.9 years ago
al-ash ▴ 200

I'm using Trimmomatic/0.33 to proces my raw Illumina reads. I've seen some adapter contamination with FASTQC so I first run Trimmomatic as follows:

java -jar trimmomatic-0.33.jar PE R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz PR1.fastq.gz UPR1.fastq.gz PR2.fastq.gz UPR2.fastq.gz ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10:1:keepBothReads

TruSeq3-PE-2.fa contains:

>PrefixPE/1
TACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT
>PrefixPE/2
GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT
>PE1
TACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT
>PE1_rc
AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTA
>PE2
GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT
>PE2_rc
AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCAC

Trimmomatic reports back:

Input Read Pairs: 39618168 
Both Surviving: 28128581 (71.00%) 
Forward Only Surviving: 8927582 (22.53%) 
Reverse Only Surviving: 47164 (0.12%) 
Dropped: 2514841 (6.35%)

I was surprised that despite selecting the option to keep both reads even if they are palindromic via "keepBothReads" there is only 71% of "Both Surviving" : what might be the reads which did not survive? I can think of them only as entirely consisting of adapter sequences - is that correct? Thanks for any suggestion!

Trimmomatic pair-end Illumina adapter trimming • 2.7k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
5.8 years ago
annsun89 ▴ 30

Hi, I read the manual and <keepbothreads> is the name of the parameter but it's not how to set it. Instead, try

java -jar trimmomatic-0.33.jar PE R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz PR1.fastq.gz UPR1.fastq.gz PR2.fastq.gz UPR2.fastq.gz ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10:1:TRUE
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1508 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6