I tried with 38.86 showing same error ?
HI Why snpEff not able to download GRCH38 ?
Always its showing error, But its work well with GRCH37 reference. Thanks for your comments.
pinn@Curium:~/Downloads/snpEff_latest_core/snpEff$ java -jar snpEff.jar download GRCh38.76 java.lang.RuntimeException: Property: 'GRCh38.76.genome' not found at org.snpeff.interval.Genome.<init>(Genome.java:106) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.Config.readGenomeConfig(Config.java:681) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.Config.readConfig(Config.java:649) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.Config.init(Config.java:480) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.Config.<init>(Config.java:117) at org.snpeff.SnpEff.loadConfig(SnpEff.java:451) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.commandLine.SnpEffCmdDownload.runDownloadGenome(SnpEffCmdDownload.java:80) at org.snpeff.snpEffect.commandLine.SnpEffCmdDownload.run(SnpEffCmdDownload.java:72) at org.snpeff.SnpEff.run(SnpEff.java:1183) at org.snpeff.SnpEff.main(SnpEff.java:162)
T
2 answers
Try 38.86. That seems to be the latest GRCh38 as of now.
I had the same issue, just search for the version available and download it:
$ java -Xmx4g -jar snpEff.jar databases | grep GRCh38
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Insufficient space for shared memory file:
526
Try using the -Djava.io.tmpdir= option to select an alternate temp location.
GRCh38.99 Homo_sapiens https://snpeff.blob.core.windows.net/databases/v5_0/snpEff_v5_0_GRCh38.99.zip
GRCh38.p13.RefSeq Human genome GRCh38 using RefSeq transcripts https://snpeff.blob.core.windows.net/databases/v5_0/snpEff_v5_0_GRCh38.p13.RefSeq.zip
$ java -Xmx4g -jar snpEff.jar download -c snpEff.config -v GRCh38.99
Log in to answer this question.

What is your command? can you post it here?
Sorry, its working with 38.86
The same thing happened to me. The command is: java -jar snpEff.jar download GRCh38.76
-> http://snpeff.sourceforge.net/download.html
Did you try the solution posted below by genomax?
Hello pinninti1991reddy!
Please follow up on your questions. See C: Readgroups for a bam file ?
For this reason we have closed your question.
If you disagree please tell us why in a reply below, we'll be happy to talk about it.
Cheers!
Reopening question as user has provided feedback.