Alternative splicing with covariates
Hi everyone, I have a file containing psi values for samples and I wanted to compare the differential splicing between two groups of my datasets, adjusting for covariates. Can I just give the dataset of the splicing events to limma? Is there a statistic method especially designed for that kind of data that takes into account covariates? Thanks
• 1,806 views
•
link
updated
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
lirongrossmann •
•
written
by
lirongrossmann •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Calculate PSI from bam files from one sample(with 2 duplicates)
written by pxd •
-
False discovery rates for moderated t-statistic
written by alexei.leliavski •
-
Direct statistical testing of PSI (Percent Spliced In)?
written by marquimedes21 •
-
Removing Unknown Batch Effects and Latent Confounders in Splicing PSI Data
written by eggerj •
-
Normalise batch effects for Percent Spliced In (PSI) matrice
written by ZheFrench
-
Converting unstranded samples to strand specific
written by lirongrossmann •
-
Selecting genes that best separate between two groups
written by lirongrossmann •
-
Remove batch effect for differential expression
written by Ron
-
limma applied to unbalanced micro-array experiment
written by ewre
-
Differential expression gene list from TCGA level 3 RNASeq V2 datasets downloaded from UCSC Cancer …
written by zeeniajagga •
I presume that you have followed the methods used by the main publication by Wang back in 2008, who also used PSI values? - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593745/
Thanks, Kevin! I actually got a file of samples with PSI values for each splicing events that was generated by a yet unpublished method and want to see if there is a statistical difference between the PSI values between two groups within the dataset. Does DEXseq work with PSI values?
Hello lirongrossmann!
It appears that your post has been cross-posted to another site: https://support.bioconductor.org/p/101527/
This is typically not recommended as it runs the risk of annoying people in both communities.