Can you elaborate on this: The quality for read #2 is typically worse than for read #1.????
I am intrigued by this trend of my illumina reads. The forward reads for every genomic DNA sample show a good per base sequence quality (mostly Q 25-30) even towards the last base (150 bp), while the file containing reverse reads shows a drop of upto Q 12. I see this trend in all my read files and am confused about what goes wrong when the sequencing guys perform the reverse read sequencing.
1 answer
The quality for read #2 is typically worse than for read #1. Having said that, a drop of 12 is a bit much for 150 base reads, you typically only see large decreases with 250 base long rapid runs on HiSeq 2500s. It's possible that there was a technical issue late in the run, ask the people that run the machine. On the plus side, the quality still sounds OK for most uses.
There's no elaboration needed, that's generally the case for Illumina sequencers.
Log in to answer this question.