Is it normal that there are more non-synonymous SNPs Than synonymous SNPs in mouse cell lines?
I analyzed whole exome seq data from 5 mouse cell lines without matched normal. I used bwa -> GATK realignment -> GATK recalibration -> Varscan2 -> annovar for variant calling. I used GRCm38 as the reference genome. Three of these cell lines have much more (almost twice) non-synonymous SNPS than synonymous SNPs. Is that normal? I would expect more synonymous SNP in the data. The remaining two cell lines have more synonymous SNPs.
Thank you so much.
• 2,109 views
•
link
written
by
zhaoyang198691 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
No available matched normal for Mutect2 GATK
written by shems2001 •
-
Known-variant and AF-only files of GATK Mutect2 on Mouse DNA sequencing data
written by whb •
-
Mouse strain-specific somatic whole genome alignment and variant calling (Balb/cJ)
written by mleukam1 •
-
mice whole Exome sequencing Analysis
written by tarekzakaria.badr •
-
Finding SNPs between two inbred genetic lines
written by colin.kern
-
Gold Standard for Human cancer exome sequencing
written by Jerome Lin •
-
Forum: Discrepancy between Whole Exome Sequence result and Sanger Sequence result
written by haiying.kong
-
No Somatic SNV Calling with GATK?
written by sichan
-
Annotating variants with Annovar, Oncotator and SnpEFF
written by ivivek_ngs
-
Data Set Suitable For Comparing Wgs, Exome, And Rna-Seq Data Generated From The Same Samples
written by Malachi Griffith
It is very much normal !