Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for your response. I am sorry for providing incomplete information. The example given is just a representative of my data. The experiment was performed on individual gene knockout strains and there are 123 different genes (and orthologs in other species) which showed either resistance or sensitivity across three species. I converted the result into binary data (1 for resistance and 0 for sensitive) to find a correlation. Just looking at my data, I could also see there is no correlation but I am looking for a statistical interpretation. I provided a bigger example of my data below. Thanks again.
Gene Species1 Species2 Species3
Gene1 1 0 0
Gene2 1 0 0
Gene3 1 NA NA
Gene4 1 0 0
Gene5 1 0 0
Gene6 1 0 0
Gene7 1 0 0
Gene8 1 0 0
Gene9 1 0 0
Gene10 1 0 0
Gene11 0 1 0
Gene12 0 1 0
Gene13 0 1 0
Gene14 0 1 NA
Gene15 0 1 0
Gene16 0 0 1
Gene17 0 0 1
Gene18 0 0 1
Gene19 0 0 1
Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for your response. I am sorry for providing incomplete information. The example given is just a representative of my data. The experiment was performed on individual gene knockout strains and there are 123 different genes (and orthologs in other species) which showed either resistance or sensitivity across three species. I converted the result into binary data (1 for resistance and 0 for sensitive) to find a correlation. Just looking at my data, I could also see there is no correlation but I am looking for a statistical interpretation. I provided a bigger example of my data below. Thanks again.
Please use
ADD REPLY/ADD COMMENTwhen responding to existing posts to keep threads logically organized.Right, should have refreshed before posting. I'm afraid that sentence is the most used line on Biostars.
Please use
ADD COMMENTto reply to earlier answers, as such this thread remains logically structured and easy to follow.Sorry, I modified as suggested but unable to delete my 2nd post.