STAR --quantMode GeneCounts vs featureCounts
Has anyone compared output from STAR --quantMode GeneCounts and featureCounts? Are there any major differences in reporting? I have read that STAR's GeneCounts behaves like HTSeq run with default parameters. Does anyone have a preference for one tool vs the other? If so, why?
1 answer
Read the featureCounts paper. They have compared with other quantification tools.
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
GouthamAtla
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Strandedness issues in STAR quantification
written by marek.gierlinski •
-
t2t RNAseq alignment with STAR
written by eva_u •
-
STAR pair-end gene count discrepancy vs. RSEM
written by anon •
-
Large Count Discrepancy of Key Gene Between STAR and HISAT2
written by dk0319 •
-
STAR aligner - multimaps vs. strandedness
written by cjag •
-
Why STAR Aligner limits alignments to soft-masked regions (lowercase letters in reference genome)?
written by MarVi •
-
star --readFilesIn error when using unmapped.out.mate1/2 files
written by kokoko •
-
Difference between read counts STAR vs featureCounts
written by sg197 •
-
htseq-count stopped with 0 bytes in count file
written by wbliu •
-
RNA-seq: Explain STAR quantMode geneCounts values
written by williantafsilva •
