Direct comparison of epitope-tagged vs endogenous (ChIP-seq)
Is anyone aware of any papers which have a direct comparison of epitope-tagged vs endogenous for ChIP-seq?
I've noticed that people frequently tag histones in experiments and I'm not convinced that this is a good strategy. I'm trying to find out if this method has been properly validated.
Thanks!
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Looking for phytopathogenic, Nitrogen-Fixing, and Growth-Promoting databases for Metagenomic Analys…
written by Christopher •
-
Removing umi split off as a separate fastq (RNA-seq)
written by YJ •
-
Why don't we align to pre-RNA for typical single-cell RNA-seq data? (CellRanger or STARsolo GeneFul…
written by scideas •
-
Obtaining gene sets from KEGG or other sources
written by jleehan •
-
GWAS on CNV - looking for method
written by GWASG •
-
Can one use Venn diagrams for identifying genes that are commonly differentially expressed in two i…
written by marcos.georgiades.18 •
-
Help with CHiP-seq experimental design
written by hapax0 •
-
Cell cycle expression/ChIP in mouse
written by jotan
-
Indel Discovery Delly, Pindel, Samtools, Gatk
written by rob234king
-
Is There Interest In K-Node Network Motifs For Large K?
written by Douglas S. Stones •
