To infer marker-based phylogeny, does one use GenBank or RefSeq?
For an general phylogeny based on marker genes, does one prefer to use Ref Seq or GenBank submissions?
Since the Ref Seq contains contains non-redundant sequences, does then redundancy = completeness of genomic data?
• 1,308 views
•
link
written
by
frenchmytoast112 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
GCA vs GCF or both
written by cyberbrainedu •
-
running RAxML and MrBayes over concatinated multiple sequence alignments
written by Moses
-
Help with Designing an Approach for Biomarker Signature Generation
written by JJ
-
Get all bacterial protein sequences from Genbank but non redundant
written by mschmid
-
How to download multiple sequences from a database (ie Genbank) in Perl given a text file that cont…
written by Andrea •
-
Downloading sequences of genes related to a pathway in PlantCyc (or other cyc related databases) an…
written by ahmad.iut
-
phylogeny using 2 alleles per loci data
written by Cherry •
-
makeblastdb problem for bacterial genomes
written by niu2rseq
-
Why Are Refseq Ids And Genbank Id / Embl Ids Mixed?
written by Bbd •
-
Alignment Of Split Orfs
written by Liam Thompson
