Why there is a low quality region at the beginning of the read?
I knew that there was bias in the first few bases produced by random priming, but that bias should only affect the fragment position in the genome rather than the fragment sequencing quality
• 1,427 views
•
link
updated
by
GenoMax
•
written
by
--panda-- •
•
written
by
--panda-- •
1 answer
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Why does including BQ<10 bases change Mutect2 calls in NovaSeq X Plus ctDNA data?
written by Anthony •
-
Any reason to do MiSeq over NextSeq 2000?
written by hjarnek •
-
Distribution of gap sizes in assemblies made with ALLPATH-LG
written by sipsik •
-
Correcting odd GC bias in whole-exome CNV calling
written by murphy.charlesj
-
Removing GC content bias and trended bias from ChIP-seq data
written by James Ashmore
-
How to calculate q value in rna-seq data?
written by --panda-- •
-
Normalized Smith-Waterman Formula
written by '
-
Non-uniform illumina coverage, why?
written by bitjunkie •
-
Effects of random hexamer priming bias in RNA-Seq de novo assembly
written by Nestor Wendt
-
HiSeq2000 RNA-seq QC
written by Ming Tommy Tang
