This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Cufflinks gffread utility

Hello,

This is a question regarding the following utility:

http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/cufflinks/file_formats/#the-gffread-utility

If I use gffread for genomic features labelled as existing on the negative strand, will gffread find the reverse complement automatically when extracting the sequence from the fasta file, or will I have to implement an additional step to get that?

Any info on this would be greatly appreciated.

cufflinks gffread gff reverse complement
• 7,711 views • link
updated by madzayasodara • madzayasodara • written by Thomas Thomas

Hello! Any ideas why I'm getting a seg fault when I run this?

gffread BF_annotation.gtf -W -O -E -L -F -w BF_transcripts.fa -g BF_genome.fa
GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (8436614-8437382) with exon (8436535-8436613) for GFF ID KDM4A on scaffold_1
GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (319524-319638) with exon (319006-319523) for GFF ID ZFYVE28 on scaffold_199
GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (1352880-1353047) with exon (1351726-1352879) for GFF ID FLAD1 on scaffold_218
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

and when I run without certain arguments: gffread -w BF_transcripts.fa -W -O -E -g ./BF_genome.fa BF_annotation.gtf

it outputs warnings:

GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (8436614-8437382) with exon (8436535-8436613) for GFF ID KDM4A on scaffold_1
GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (319524-319638) with exon (319006-319523) for GFF ID ZFYVE28 on scaffold_199
GFF Warning: merging overlapping/adjacent feature segment exon (1352880-1353047) with exon (1351726-1352879) for GFF ID FLAD1 on scaffold_218
Error (GFaSeqGet): subsequence cannot be larger than 1560
Error getting subseq for BLEC (1..1561)!

I hadn't seen this post before and made a related post: C: Get sequences for all genes in a GTF file

Thanks!

• 1 views • link
written by madzayasodara • madzayasodara

I cleaned the .gtf from some genes (4 of them) and it run without warnings, but I'm not clear this is how I should have proceeded.

• 1 views • link
written by madzayasodara • madzayasodara

In the warning messages, it is just saying that some of your gene exon co-ordinates overlap. For example:

GENE1
___________________________________________
TRANSCRIPTION --> 
                                 _______________________________________________________
                                 TRANSCRIPTION -->               
                                                                                   GENE2

You can see that there is some overlap in the middle. This is the situation that you have on 3 of your scaffolds (1, 199, 218).

This is not necessarily a problem. Even in the human transcriptome CDS FASTA file from GENCODE, many genes have the same sequences because they also overlap. It may be a problem depending on what are your next analysis steps.

• 1 views • link
written by Kevin Blighe Kevin Blighe

1 answer

Sorry the the late response.

Yes, it certainly will read the reverse complement and take strand-specific information into account:

cat mergedAll.gtf 
BacterialGenome.1   Cufflinks   exon    2   500 .   +   .   gene_id "XLOC_000001"; transcript_id "TCONS_00000001"; exon_number "1"; oId "CUFF.10.1"; tss_id "TSS1";
BacterialGenome.1   Cufflinks   exon    2   500 .   -   .   gene_id "XLOC_000628"; transcript_id "TCONS_00000630"; exon_number "1"; oId "CUFF.1.1"; tss_id "TSS630";

.

gffread -w test.fasta -W -O -E -L -F -g BacterialGenomeReference.fasta mergedAll.gtf

.

cat test.fasta 
>TCONS_00000001 gene=XLOC_000001 loc:BacterialGenome.1|2-500|+ exons:2-500 segs:1-499 oId=CUFF.10.1 tss_id=TSS1
CATCACAGACACTACGCATAAGGGGCTATCACCCTCTATGGCCGGACTTTCCATTCCGTTCTGCTTCTTC
TGCAACAATCACGGGCCTGTTCCGCGTTCGCTCGCCACTACTAGCGGAATCTCAATTGATGTCTTTTCCT
CCGGGTACTTAGATGTTTCAGTTCCCCGGGTTCGCCTCATGCCCCTATGTATTCAGAACATGATACCCAT
CGCTGGGTGGGTTGCCCCATTCAGATATCCACGGATCAAAGCCTGCTCGCGGCTCCCCATGGCTTTTCGC
AGCGTGCCACGTCTTTCATCGCCTCCTGGTGCCAAGGCATCCACCGAATGCCCTTATCGCGCTCATTCAC
CACACATGCACAGGAGCCATCCACCCTGGGGCAGACAGTCCCGCACATAAGAAAGTGCAGTTCATCTCAC
GACCACTCTATTCTCTTTACGTCGTCCATGTTCGCTTACGCCACATCGCACAGCACGCAATACCCCGGTT
CCCCGGACC
>TCONS_00000630 gene=XLOC_000628 loc:BacterialGenome.1|2-500|- exons:2-500 segs:1-499 oId=CUFF.1.1 tss_id=TSS630
GGTCCGGGGAACCGGGGTATTGCGTGCTGTGCGATGTGGCGTAAGCGAACATGGACGACGTAAAGAGAAT
AGAGTGGTCGTGAGATGAACTGCACTTTCTTATGTGCGGGACTGTCTGCCCCAGGGTGGATGGCTCCTGT
GCATGTGTGGTGAATGAGCGCGATAAGGGCATTCGGTGGATGCCTTGGCACCAGGAGGCGATGAAAGACG
TGGCACGCTGCGAAAAGCCATGGGGAGCCGCGAGCAGGCTTTGATCCGTGGATATCTGAATGGGGCAACC
CACCCAGCGATGGGTATCATGTTCTGAATACATAGGGGCATGAGGCGAACCCGGGGAACTGAAACATCTA
AGTACCCGGAGGAAAAGACATCAATTGAGATTCCGCTAGTAGTGGCGAGCGAACGCGGAACAGGCCCGTG
ATTGTTGCAGAAGAAGCAGAACGGAATGGAAAGTCCGGCCATAGAGGGTGATAGCCCCTTATGCGTAGTG
TCTGTGATG
• 0 views • link
written by Kevin Blighe Kevin Blighe

In gffread, if I need only TCONS_00033653 and gene_id "XLOC_028018 ID. what is command I should use?

Actually, I used gffread -w ECvsEL_transcript.fasta -g v.corymbosum_GDV_reftransV1.fasta EC_vs_EL.gtf

But I get only TCONS_00033653 ID

Thank you so much kanjana

• 0 views • link
written by worarado.kan • worarado.kan

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this