How is this related to question at all?
• 1 views
•
link
written
by
Michael Dondrup
Are there tools for finding ORF for multiple sequences
Hello guys, I have a several thousands of de novo assembled sequences form RNA-seq, some of them are annotated and some them are not. If I wanna predict their ORF for checking out for how many of them have complete ORF and how many does not？And where is the Start codon and where is the Stop codon？How i am gonna do that? Is there any tools? Thanks in advance.
1 answer
Unfortunately, we don't have revisions any more. I think that having revision tracking in place would help.
• 1 views
•
link
written
by
Michael Dondrup
I agree, the question and answer together form the added value, if and only if these two are related. However by using the revision system, a moderator could restore the content to the initial state. Another helpful mechanism would be to be able to lock posts for editing.
• 2 views
•
link
written
by
Michael Dondrup
I never realized that this would actually happen.
Normally it would make no sense for someone to do that. But now that I thought about it here are possible reasons:
- New users can only create two questions per 6 hours, so it is possible that someone thinks this is a way to ask a new question right away. This falls into that "unintended consequences" category.
- Perhaps the users realizes later that their question is really about something else want to correct the original question.
The solutions are not easy to either, we do want to allow people to fix up titles and typos, pushing a new version for each of these is somewhat of an overkill. So is maintaining the infrastructure to view, display and revert the changes. We have to see how this evolves.
• 2 views
•
link
written
by
Istvan Albert
IMHO, one solution could be to lock the editing option once an answer was given (before that he may change it as much as he wants!), the one who is asking still can add comments and replies, the new comments, ideas and its answers will flow in harmony afterwards!
Making questions locked on the first answer might be overly strict, because questions could get clarified or improved in the light of a first answer, e.g. if op sees misunderstanding or is asked for clarification, even after an answer has been accepted. To not be able to edit own questions at all would maybe feel scary also. A versioning system for questions and answers -like on SE- could be part of the solution, it was there in a previous version, but somehow was removed in between.
I remember a case where there was an interesting question comparing the RNA seq tools Kallisto and Salmon and suddenly the content of the question disappeared, without further explanation. Maybe op made a mistake or whatever, it still would have been worth discussing the results.
• 2 views
•
link
written
by
Michael Dondrup
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Mapping soft for de novo assembly
written by takoyaki
-
miRNA predictions from large set of long non coding RNA
written by Bioinfonext
-
De novo assembled transcript mapping to genome scaffold
written by Bioinfonext
-
Blast unigenes with set of protein sequences
written by Kurban
-
is there any tools for get Entrez id and gene symbol for multiple transcriptome sequences
written by Kurban
-
how to do GOSlim-Generic
written by Kurban
-
how do KOG classification and KEGG analysis based on nucleotide sequences?
written by Kurban
-
how do I check the sequencing reads
written by Kurban
-
how much cpu and RAM needed to assemble transcriptome by using trinity
written by Kurban
-
transcription factor database
written by Kurban
Hello Kurban!
Questions similar to yours can already be found at:
We have closed your question to allow us to keep similar content in the same thread.
If you disagree with this please tell us why in a reply below. We'll be happy to talk about it.
Cheers!
Hi Kurban, please don't make revisions that in effect turn the question into a completely different one. Please open a new question after carefully searching for existing questions.