Thank you very much for your response! I will try the ideas you suggest.
I have two different data frames , one per condition, where each one of them has 3 columns:
specie : a qualitative value
population@4days : population calculated for that specie at 4 days
population@12days : population calculated for that specie at 12 days
Using basic calculations I have computed the growth rate for each population and now I want to compare the two distribution of rates ( I am interested in a global conclusion, not specific for each specie)
My question is if I need to normalize to correctly compare them. The number and species in each one is different and the sum of population is also different between all of them.
If I have to, which will be the best way to normalize and compare them?
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
1 answer
ok, so...a couple of things:
this sounds more like statistics than bioinformatics, so maybe stats.stackexchange.com would give you a more comprehensive answer and explanation
if you look at the distribution overall, a kolmogorov smirnov test could work (
ks.test()in R) since it's a non-parametric test that checks whether the values come from the same distribution.a wilcox test is also non-parametric, looks at the median values and does not require normally distributed values (
wilcox.test()in R)a simple
t.testcould be used if you have normally distributed data and enough samples, it will compare the mean of the values.
I don't know how your data look or how many values you have, I would go with either ks.test() or wilcox.test()
The data is not normal. I have enough data to apply central limit theorem so I am currently subsampling and computing the mean 10000 times and doing the study with the distributions of means.
not sure why you want to subsample and do a bootstrapping-like approach. you don't need to apply the central limit theorem...maybe check if other papers that did the same study used it?
Log in to answer this question.
if I get your question right you are asking how to (if) normalize and compare the populations at 4 vs. 14 days, is that correct?
if so, do you have a day 0? that would be your initial point where to normalize that data to.
how many samples do you have per each time point?
do you need/want to do 0 vs. 4; 0 vs. 12; 4 vs. 12?
also, population of...?..minions?
Yes! That is correct, is a global comparison of growth for different bacterial populations exposed to two different conditions and data collected at 4 and 12 days. I don't have a time 0 but I have 2 replicas per time for each condition (2 conditions, 2 times, 2 replicas each one).
The comparison tries to define is one of the conditions allows a better general growth for the mixed population.