Thanks for the input and for the links.
Do you think the "effective genome size" should be calculated the same way I'm doing the mapping? For example, if I'm retaining only uniquely mapped reads, then I should calculate the mappability as uniquely mappable regions but if I'm retaining also reads that mapped twice or three times then maybe I should determine the mappability as the regions that are mappable two- or three times?
Is there a site you know of that explains the statistics behind the effective size?
Thanks