Thanks a lot Cyriac! That's an impressive amount of columns you've added and indeed makes this data very attractive. We're striving to conduct a pan-cancer analysis and would highly prefer to restrict ourselves to donors for which RNAseq is also available - granted that this restriction will leave us with a sufficiently large body of donors. The ICGC data portal seems attractive, as it has both data types for a large amount of patients (~4500) and also incorporates other projects besides TCGA. Do you perhaps already know the amount of donors included in your MAFs (8804) for which RNAseq is also available? I'm not sure whether the MAFs in the ICGC have been subjected to a similarly rigorous filtering procedure as yours.
Good point on the variant calling differences between the cohorts, I think that is something we will have to live with but consider in our analyses as it seems unpractical to do the variant calling on all the raw sequencing files ourselves (we're a small team). I'm looking forward to the PCAWG for that purpose!
Thanks! I've been looking for MAFs that contain additional fields in Firehose and the TCGA data portal but no luck yet on finding any that include REF and ALT allele counts, will get back to you as soon as I'm successful.
try here:
https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/TCGA/TCGA+MAF+Files
Thanks once again! The UCSC produced MAF files I looked at indeed include REF and ALT allele counts. Is there a 1-to-1 correspondence between presence of this field in the MAF file and presence in the corresponding protected VCF file? In other words, would it be useful to apply for access to the protected VCF files nonetheless?
And I should have mentioned that ICGC maintains a much cleaner DCC than TCGA here: https://dcc.icgc.org/repository/icgc/current/
Try their .TSV files of somatic mutations. I believe they have allele counts for at least a subset of tumor types.
For future reference in this rather daunting task of finding pan-cancer MAFs, there is no standard column that stores VAF in TCGA MAFs (See this post) but rather there are varying column names between the GDACs that created the MAFs.
In addition to Sean's link, this page by the Broad seems to provide additional TCGA MAFs by different GDACs.
HGSC generated files include columns named:
TTotCovTVarCovNTotCovNVarCovBroad institute generated files include columns named:
t_alt_countt_ref_countThe Broad's list above does not include Sanger MAFs, of which at least one (example here) includes the fields
n_ref_countanda_ref_count.Between those, almost all malignancies should be covered with a MAF that includes VAF. For those that seem outdated on the Broad's list (e.g. COAD, revised in 2013), the reference on the TCGA page is just as old, but I didn't check all malignancies here.
Do you have any idea about "i_TVarCov"? Sometimes there are two numbers like 19|18. What does this mean?