Hi,
I'm using metaPrDos to predict protein disorder. The result I obtained from the email output which indicates the two-state prediction of * as disordered and '' as ordered compared to the html formatted output of "red" as disordered and "black" as ordered is different. For instance, at this site (http://prdos.hgc.jp/meta/usage.html) where residue number 10 (E) and 11 (V) is not marked with an asterisk meaning that it is ordered, however at the HTML formatted output shows that residue 10 and 11 is in red, indicating it as disordered. Please correct me if I got the idea wrongly. :(
Thank you for your advice.
1 answer
My best guess from it is that they just show an example but that the settings for the example output html (on apparently the same sequence) was different (probably a different false positive rate). Thereby the examples not entirely match up.
If you run their service on this sequence you should get the definitive answer! When I run it on 5% FP rate I get the results from the html example (also correctly in mail).
Log in to answer this question.
-
How to remove the rownames in heatmap generated plot?
written by hellokwmin •
-
Deeptools plotHeatmap: too much black! missing data assigned incorrectly
written by David K •
-
What should I do when error residuals are not normally distributed in a linear mixed-effect model?
written by ybbarnatan •
-
Tutorial: Revisiting the FastQC read duplication report
written by Istvan Albert
-
Bioinformatics Q: How to align and compare two elements (sequence) in a list using python
written by Jason Lin •
-
Psiblast Fasta Formatted Output
written by Reyhaneh
-
Computational Validation Of Chip-Seq Peaks
written by daniel.soronellas
-
Print Png Output Using Perl In Html
written by Rajesh •
-
Mafft Output Distance Matrix
written by Gabriel Mitchell
-
Regarding Datamining/Knowledge Based Algorithm
written by Suk211 •
