Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
bigwig to wig conversion, getting bedgraph
Entering edit mode
20 months ago


I am using ucsc bigWigToWig conversion tool to get a wiggle format file.

However the output format I get is:

bedGraph section chr1:10458-717292

chr1 10458 10459 7.7
chr1 10459 10460 7.8
chr1 10460 10461 7.9
chr1 10461 10462 8
chr1 10462 10464 8.1
chr1 10464 10465 8.2
chr1 10465 10467 8.3

I tried redownloading the tool from ucsc, checking if this is not a file name issue with ./

I tried using another bigwig file from ENCODE, same issue.

Because using ucsc bigwig to bedgraph conversion tool, I get a proper bedgraph, I decided to go backwards.

I converted bedgraph to bigwig to wig, again same thing.

The only difference that this file has compared to a usual bedgraph file is the section part added that describes schema of the following sequences(line 1 of table scheme above). While for a wiggle file format, I expect a one chromosomal position per unit output without chromosome name:

I even tried using an older version of the tool from ucsc, same issue.

Any help would be much appreciated.


Entering edit mode
16 months ago
Freiburg, Germany

I have no clue why that's outputting bedGraph rather than wiggle format, but you can convert that to wiggle with awk:

awk '{if(NR>1) {if($1!=lastChrom){printf("variableStep chrom=%s\n",$1);lastChrom=$1;}print $2,$4}}' foo.bedGraph > foo.wig

This assumes that the first line of the bedGraph file should be ignored. This also assumes that wiggle is a 0-based format. I don't actually know if that's true or not. If it's 1-based, then just use $2+1 or $3 rather than $2. Finally, this assumes that each entry in the bedGraph file describes a single position. While one could change the code to deal with that not being the case, it'd be better to do just write a perl or python script at that point.

Entering edit mode
20 months ago

Thanks a lot Devon. The problem with this is that when we have regions not covered by bedgraph for various reasons, it will simply jump without an extra section line. This would make a problem in downstream tools using wig format.

I made this in python if someone has the similar problem and wants to solve it manually:

Entering edit mode

Hy. I have got similar problems. Did you figure out the problem? Can you show me how to run your python script? Thanks for any help.


Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.3.1