This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
illumina reads - dots vs. 'N's

Hi all,

I'm looking for a bit of a history lesson. Its been a while since I've seen this, but I recall that there was a time when fastq files (or qseqs) contained dots in place of uncalled bases where now there will be an 'N'.

Does anyone know when the transition was made?

Also, can most major aligners handle both '.' and 'N' in place of an uncallable base?

Some aligners I'm interested in:

  • BWA
  • Bowtie
  • Novoalign
  • Star
  • SNAP

Any information on the topic would be helpful.

Thanks!

fastq illumina
• 2,023 views • link
updated by Ram Ram • written by Richard Richard

Aren't the dots a color-space thing? At least that's the only place I remember seeing them.

• 0 views • link
updated by Ram Ram • written by Devon Ryan Devon Ryan

1 answer

I don't know about dots but many aligners will insert a random base for the N. Whether that counts as "handling it" depends on the needs of the user.

Come to think of it the one aligner that I know to handle N and other ambiguous bases is lastz

Kind of dovetails nicely into today's topic of: Bob Harris of the LASTZ aligner uses this

• 0 views • link
updated by Ram Ram • written by Istvan Albert Istvan Albert

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this