This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
MuSE calls too few snps

Hello everyone,

I'm encountering an issue where MuSE is producing an abnormally low number of somatic SNV calls when processing my batch of WES tumor-normal paired samples. I would greatly appreciate any insights.

Control Test: I first ran MuSE on a reference dataset (e.g., a TCGA sample). The number of SNVs called by MuSE was comparable to that from Mutect2, both falling within a reasonable range (e.g., 3,000-5,000). However, when I applied the exact same command and parameters to my own cohort of 50 breast cancer WES samples, MuSE called only between 14 to 100+ somatic SNVs per sample. This number is orders of magnitude lower than expected for WES data.

Running GATK Mutect2 (v4.3.0.0) on the same BAM files produces a normal, expected number of somatic calls (e.g., ~2,000-5,000 per sample). This confirms that the input data contains detectable somatic variants and the issue is specific to MuSE.

No Obvious Errors: The MuSE runs (call and sump steps) complete successfully without any error messages or warnings, making the root cause difficult to identify.

I would be very grateful for any advice or suggestions. I am happy to provide additional logs or file snippets if needed.

muse snp

1 answer

Hello, I think the reason is my "problematic" data comes from FFPE samples. I just ran the commands on FFPE sample data and got a similar result. Also, after checking the MuSE paper, it seems that the method is not well-suited for non-fresh , low-purity or highly heterogeneous samples. That's my conclusion for now, and I'd be grateful if anyone would like to share their thoughts.

Log in to answer this question.