That does not seem to be the case here. There are ~30-40% assignments.
• 0 views
•
link
I used featureCounts to get exon counts. And my codes are following:
'''./featureCounts -t exon --countReadPairs -M -O -f -s 0 -p -T 4 -F GTF -a /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/featurecount/Subread_to_DEXSeq/NY_for_dexseq.gtf -o /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/featurecount/DT_16vs0.txt /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_16_01.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_16_02.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_16_03.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_16_06.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_16_08.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_0_04.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_0_05.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_0_06.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_0_07.sorted.bam /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/04_samtools_SNPcalling/sort/DT_0_08.sorted.bam
''' But the output in terminals showed that the successfully assigned alignment scores were only around 40%.
> //========================== featureCounts setting ===========================\\
|| ||
|| Input files : 10 BAM files ||
|| ||
|| DT_16_01.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_16_02.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_16_03.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_16_06.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_16_08.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_0_04.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_0_05.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_0_06.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_0_07.sorted.bam ||
|| DT_0_08.sorted.bam ||
|| ||
|| Output file : DT_16vs0.txt ||
|| Summary : DT_16vs0.txt.summary ||
|| Paired-end : yes ||
|| Count read pairs : yes ||
|| Annotation : NY_for_dexseq.gtf (GTF) ||
|| Dir for temp files : /line/WJ/project/NY_Transcriptome2Genome/fea ... ||
|| ||
|| Threads : 4 ||
|| Level : feature level ||
|| Multimapping reads : counted ||
|| Multi-overlapping reads : counted ||
|| Min overlapping bases : 1 ||
|| ||
\\============================================================================//
//================================= Running ==================================\\
|| ||
|| Load annotation file NY_for_dexseq.gtf ... ||
|| Features : 215200 ||
|| Meta-features : 20538 ||
|| Chromosomes/contigs : 335 ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_16_01.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 31522099 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 11715686 (37.2%) ||
|| Running time : 0.83 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_16_02.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 29776568 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 12311903 (41.3%) ||
|| Running time : 0.76 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_16_03.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 28298923 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 12146956 (42.9%) ||
|| Running time : 0.64 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_16_06.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 31025669 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 9508592 (30.6%) ||
|| Running time : 0.97 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_16_08.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 28444412 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 9160038 (32.2%) ||
|| Running time : 0.93 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_0_04.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 27512167 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 12262121 (44.6%) ||
|| Running time : 0.63 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_0_05.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 38093207 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 14982222 (39.3%) ||
|| Running time : 0.81 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_0_06.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 86329285 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 26742040 (31.0%) ||
|| Running time : 2.83 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_0_07.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 58327939 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 21884010 (37.5%) ||
|| Running time : 1.60 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Process BAM file DT_0_08.sorted.bam... ||
|| Paired-end reads are included. ||
|| Total alignments : 20276198 ||
|| Successfully assigned alignments : 6942758 (34.2%) ||
|| Running time : 0.46 minutes ||
|| ||
|| Write the final count table. ||
|| Write the read assignment summary. ||
|| ||
|| Summary of counting results can be found in file "/line/WJ/project/NY_Tra ||
|| nscriptome2Genome/featurecount/DT_16vs0.txt.summary" ||
|| ||
\\============================================================================//
I have also found very high "Unassigned_NoFeatures" in summary.
Assigned 11715686 12311903 12146956 9508592 9160038 12262121 14982222 26742040 21884010 6942758
Unassigned_Unmapped 1434907 1376340 1462155 1588518 1277436 1343727 1724046 4257775 2630628 934777
Unassigned_Read_Type 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_Singleton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_MappingQuality 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_Chimera 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_FragmentLength 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_Duplicate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_MultiMapping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_Secondary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_NonSplit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_NoFeatures 18371506 16088325 14689812 19928559 18006938 13906319 21386939 55329470 33813301 12398663
Unassigned_Overlapping_Length 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unassigned_Ambiguity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I have no ideas what to do. Any help in this will really appreciated.
Have you verified that your genome file and gtt have matching chromosome names? That's the most common reason nothing at all would match.
Log in to answer this question.
What percentage were you expecting and why?
I ask because unassigned no features means the mapped read simply doesn't overlap your GTF file, which might be expected. For example, I have ribo-depleted total RNA, and it turns out we capture a fair bit of nascent RNAs. So when I do counts using a regular GTF, I get percentages comparable to yours. If I included counts over intronic regions, that percentage would increase because now the nascent pre-mRNA reads get counted. There's also non-gene genomic regions that have RNA signal that I don't count with a typical GTF.
Could there be information missing from your GTF file, such as specific chromosomes?